Original Research

Diagnosis and staging of laryngopharyngeal tumours with flexible endoscopy: A prospective study

Hendrik K. Uys, Andrew Pelser, Rory Attwood, Shaun Adam, Amir Afrogheh, Jos Hille, James W. Loock
South African Journal of Oncology | Vol 3 | a56 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajo.v3i0.56 | © 2019 Hendrik Kendal Uys, Andrew Pelser, Rory Attwood, Shaun Adam, Amir Afrogheh, Jos Hille, James William Loock | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 02 October 2018 | Published: 24 April 2019

About the author(s)

Hendrik K. Uys, Department of Otolaryngology, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
Andrew Pelser, Department of Otolaryngology, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
Rory Attwood, Department of Otolaryngology, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
Shaun Adam, Department of Otolaryngology, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
Amir Afrogheh, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa; and, National Health Laboratory Services of South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa
Jos Hille, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa; and, National Health Laboratory Services of South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa
James W. Loock, Department of Otolaryngology, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Many suspected laryngopharyngeal neoplasms are examination under general anaesthesia (EUA). Office-based endoscopy is already routinely performed on all patients presenting with a suspected laryngopharyngeal neoplasm. Accurate clinical staging and tissue sampling using flexible endoscopy may eliminate the need for EUA.

Aim: To compare the use of flexible endoscopy to EUA as primary diagnostic tool of laryngopharyngeal lesions to EUA, using accuracy of tissue samples obtained and clinical staging as primary outcome measures. Duration, patient tolerance and cost implications were also assessed.

Setting: The study was performed in the outpatient department and surgical theatres of Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.

Methods: A prospective study compared staging and tissue sampling accuracy with flexible endoscopy to EUA in 54 patients. Duration, tolerance and cost implications were also assessed.

Results: Flexible endoscopic biopsy had a 77.1% sensitivity, 100% specificity and 82.2% diagnostic accuracy. Liquid-based cytology had 97.3% sensitivity, 100% specificity and 97.9% diagnostic accuracy in differentiating high-grade lesions from low-grade lesions. Local staging agreement occurred in 88.6% (n = 31/35) of malignant cases. The mean duration was 15 ± 7 min; 86% of patients perceived the procedure as tolerable. Flexible endoscopy as a primary diagnostic tool would have avoided EUA in 68.6% (n = 24/35) of squamous cell carcinoma cases, with a R128 232 cost savings.

Conclusion: Office-based endoscopy is an accurate, well-tolerated, time- and cost-effective primary diagnostic tool of laryngopharyngeal lesions. It reduces the number of patients requiring EUA. Further evaluation is empirical when the histopathology does not confirm the clinical suspicion of malignancy.


Keywords

office-based procedure; flexible endoscopy; biopsy; staging; larynx; pharynx

Metrics

Total abstract views: 2817
Total article views: 3295


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.